A Conversion Chart For Reading Level Measurement Tools
by TeachThought Staff
If you’ve used AR (Accelerated Reader) as a reading motivation tool to set goals and track progress, you’re undoubtedly aware of its ability to assess general reading levels as well.
The problem is, measuring reading level is really outside of its sweet spot as a literacy tool, with better resources available from DRA, DIBELS, Lexile, Reading Recovery, and Rigby, among others. There is also the issue of availability, with most schools only using one or two of these tools, primarily in early elementary school. But what happens if you need to convert a general level from one program to another?
The Lexile Framework is the most commonly used tool in U.S. schools. It measures both text complexity and a student’s reading ability on the same scale.
Pros: Integrated into many platforms (e.g., MAP Growth, Achieve3000), easy to match books to student level
Cons: Doesn’t account for background knowledge or interest
Best for: Grades 2+, especially when used with adaptive assessments
This A–Z guided reading system uses teacher observation and running records.
Pros: Rich qualitative insight, great for small groups
Cons: Time-consuming and somewhat subjective
Best for: K–5 guided reading programs
Pearson Assessments
DRA provides a reading level based on fluency, accuracy, and comprehension.
Pros: Thorough snapshots of reading behaviors
Cons: Requires individual testing time
Best for: K–3 diagnostic use
Renaissance Learning: A computer-adaptive test that quickly identifies a student’s reading level and ZPD (Zone of Proximal Development).
Pros: Fast, scalable, data-rich
Cons: Less diagnostic depth
Best for: Benchmarking and screening in grades 2–12
i-Ready.com: This adaptive test provides personalized insight into student reading ability and links directly to instructional content.
Pros: Detailed reports, integrated curriculum
Cons: Proprietary system; requires full buy-in
Best for: Schools using i-Ready across subjects
These programs assign students leveled readers and allow for ongoing reading assessment.
Pros: Huge digital library, built-in quizzes
Cons: Leveling doesn’t always align with other systems
Best for: Daily reading practice and progress monitoring (Grades K–5)
Varies by publisher—examples include Qualitative Reading Inventory and Basic Reading Inventory
Pros: Teacher-led, provides rich insight
Cons: Not standardized, takes time
Best for: Individual diagnosis and conference-based instruction
A Conversion Chart For Reading Level Measurement Tools
A Conversion Chart For Reading Level Measurement Tools
By Marina Johnson, Nabra Nelson. Marina and Nabra take a sweeping look at thirty years…
Live From the Blue Seats will be back tonight as some combination of Dave, Rob,…
Retail investors are reportedly the largest cohort in Strategy’s high-yield, low-volatility “Stretch” shares, which have…
Some scholars have argued that Marcel Duchamp's upturned urinal, titled Fountain and signed "R Mutt",…
Physician incomes are extraordinarily high in the United States. A new NBER paper finds that…
Cognitive dissonance is the psychological discomfort people feel when their beliefs, values, or self-image conflict…
