Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy changed the original 1956 framework by updating the level names to verbs, reordering the top levels, and adding a second dimension for types of knowledge. The revision clarifies what students do cognitively and how those actions interact with factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge.
| Original (1956) | Revised (2001) |
|---|---|
| Knowledge | Remember |
| Comprehension | Understand |
| Application | Apply |
| Analysis | Analyze |
| Synthesis | Create |
| Evaluation | Evaluate |
The revision introduced the Taxonomy Table: a grid that crosses six cognitive processes with four knowledge types. This helps teachers specify outcomes and assessments more precisely, for example, Analyze x using conceptual knowledge or Apply y using procedural knowledge.
From 1995 to 2000, a team led by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl updated Bloom’s Taxonomy to reflect contemporary cognitive science and classroom assessment practice. The goal was to honor the original while making it more actionable for planning, instruction, and evaluation.
Reference: David R. Krathwohl (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
By Nabra Nelson, Marina Johnson, Nora el Samahy. This episode is a deep dive into…
Colorado is currently being exposed without Cale Makar, but perhaps it was a case of…
Strategy chairman Michael Saylor has not ruled out the company offloading some Bitcoin as early…
But while an actor from Ireland or the Antipodes would be acceptable, the consensus seems…
Ten notable facts from India’s new SRS Statistical Report 2024 published two days ago: 1)…
If your daily commute to school could use a little more zip—or your weekend adventures…